I'd like to report Templar (now ex-staff) for carrying out biased, inaccurate (excessive) and unjustified punishment (permban) on me months ago. I believe I was banned solely because of issues between me and certain people of personal nature. I do not think the provided evidence portrays me slandering GC and/or any of its specific members. This, this and the fact that Templar left the staff team literally the day after (possibly to avoid criticism) just assures me further. I've been told that the decision about banning me wasn't in fact made by the whole staff team, but correct (and prove) me if I am wrong. I am aware that he dislikes me personally and associates with people who do as well, who have been warned/punished in the past for their behaviour. Not to mention the obvious hostile attitude, which persists to this day. I did not break any rules (which I also stated in my ban appeal, which was accepted). I might have used some not-so-nice words (as seen in the evidence) but I have already apologized for that in my ban appeal and I don't think that'd qualify for an immediate permban. Not to mention the fact that my previous bans have been voided recently. Which makes it safe to assume that the judgement was flawed. I wonder why? The least I expect is an acknowledgement of the mistake and an apology from every single staff member who agreed on the ban back then (public or private, their choice) and a change, so it does not repeat in the future (You had all the 'evidence' and you could've looked into it before making the decision). The least. But if we're giving out permanent bans so loosely now, I guess one for Templar would be most fitting. Or at least a reeeally lengthy one. And no, it's not too late.